Lifespan Report Excerpts
50-100+ Years Added To Your Life - Now - With Present Technology
3. Necessary Basis of Evidence and Testing
Walford's diet is unequivocally proven in rats and mice. The only questions are WHY and will it work the same in humans. (It seems to in humans and monkeys over the short run and in every warm-blooded mammal species tested over long-run). Yet, NO reason has been scientifically, rationally suggested or theorized as to why it would not possibly work exactly the same in humans. Those aware of it and ignoring it are simply "waiting to see" and/or desire government "approval". [The hunger induced by a diet that burns carbohydrates - and then restricts calories - is another issue (below) and can be overcome.]
That Walford's diet actually slows the aging process is still a theory in humans, but one of most previously well-supported, potentially immediately and permanently valuable and "surest" of any theory I can imagine. THE ONLY REASON it is not proved - or "approved" - is to test in humans would take 25-100+ years from now (maybe 80-200+ by laughable non-integrated government / bureaucratic standards). Think of what will otherwise surely happen to you if you don't act on this now. (How about your family? Your pets?) In the last 5-10 years there have been a flurry of independent studies verifying Walford and the previous work on which his diet is based; this was well explained in lay terms in the Life Extension Report. Walford has already done the preliminary work - take advantage of it.
This brings up what must now be made clear:
Important Context and Purpose of This Report [entire remainder of #3]
Lack of Things To "Justify", and
Who These Reports Are For:
These reports are by, for, and dedicated to those who express - in public - via actions not just words, the fidelity to Reality (a.k.a. actual courage) necessary either to not have or see past "their own little world" (biases, preconceptions, gambling with judgment / guessing, escaping the rational use of the mind by hiding in tradition and "everybody knows" popular theories & rationalizations)...
...for & to those who actually test ** their thoughts and mere "everybody" or "I already know" theories long enough to see their own (& others) biases / rationalizations (no matter how "precious" they be [typically to other people]) and then test enough to see more of Reality for what it is...
** Testing is the opposite of external authority searches in the form of blind dependence / similar reliance on the mere interpretation of pre-supplied, very pre-packaged "peer-reviewed / censored" published studies. By definition, such interpretation is 99+% mystically-funded & promoted. Valid testing means in / on oneself & others - not overly based on "other peoples" results - with simple, easy, inexpensive laboratory & home tests devoid of vested interests, biases, human parasites, & related "popularity contests". Valid rational testing consists of the kind 99.9+% of all M.D.'s ignore (ultra-darkfield microscope, kinesiology, Clark device, rational observance [by oneself &/or others] of complete and long-lasting / permanent remission of symptoms, standard medical tests but rationally used in their proper context - not as external authority substitutes for proper, rational self-guidance / use of the mind which includes the above tests, etc.).
...for & to those who can and do (even in public) see and integrate Reality for what it is, not what they / "everybody" may want it to be, no matter the level of "pretending" or "fairy tales" going on...
...for & to those who can and do both identify and acknowledge the existence of general, imminent and immediately valuable, "outside the head" occurrences that "just happen", whether due to themselves or other people...
...i.e. for & to those who are grown up enough to identify and acknowledge (not smear, confuse, mystify, or give the "silent treatment" to) general extremely relevant "status quo destroying or not" occurrences that exist "even outside" the realm of things they may or may not use as their normal external-authorities (pay-checks, income, M.D.'s, government, etc.)... i.e. for and to those honest enough to acknowledge such occurrences "outside" their favorite writing / publishing, drug, vitamin, herb, standard medical "opinion" or other company / government... i.e. for & to those who acknowledge such occurrences that arise / exist "outside" of any group of people prone to band together to support / perpetuate their own rationalizations, inactivity, laziness, or maintenance of past lesser values. (This is regardless if the group's "purpose" is immediate / "quick" profit / "selling it" to others or the slightly less evolved non-profit motivated "pushing-it-off-on"-other-people-approach)... i.e. for & to people whose "attention spans" extend "out" to Reality...
...for & to those who have no regard for any and all "perceived" self-interests and non-objective / "laziness" biases in maintaining established income / gain deriving actions in the marketplace when such biases, interests & actions conflict with Reality / things of (far) greater value and (rational) reason to engage in...
...for & to those who take one look at the status quo / "way things are" and laugh / shake their heads & then do something about it...
...i.e. those like Dr. Beck (though still widely & purposely ignored, rationalized, & unrecognized, responsible for clearly one of the most important non-mystical advances / "integrations" in the recorded history of medicine [or possibly science period.]) (And of those simple, easy to use ones that are specifically, immediately applicable to everyone alive... possibly the most important) (regardless if it's insignificant cost is ever covered by their "health" insurance). (And no, neocheaters go away - as far as I know, he doesn't practice medicine, answer medical questions, make, sell, advise, or use them, on anyone but himself, nor do I, nor have we met, nor are we affiliated with each other. He only tells others how (and I don't think he charges anything for it either) - and I only use it on myself / "integrate" it and tell others "about" it)...
...i.e. for & to those who do not make a living using to any degree the technique of pandering to ignorance, laziness, or mysticism and do not earn any income period by telling people whatever they think the group wants to hear, already knows, or will easily accept...
...i.e. these reports are for & to those who are unlike all the rest and are honest...
...i.e. for & to those who possess the level of integration and absence of laziness to change things for their own good, or to allow things to be changed for their own good... (which, when done "right", also "just happens" to be for the good of others as well).
The purpose of this report is to identify, review and integrate - without the slightest supplement, drug, diet, conventional, unconventional, specific therapy / specialized non-integrated training / "practice", or other bias (for / against) or affiliation - the most valuable useable therapies in existence. This means and includes publications (if any, explaining the therapies in detail) immediately available and completely understandable to the average person for purposes of surviving death due to aging and preventing the health epidemic of accompanying killer diseases to the maximum possible extent. If it's not possible to be "immortal" now, then it's possible to sustain health by slowing the aging process using current "theoretical / experimental / proven in rats, etc." therapies until the aging process can successfully and reliably be halted in humans once and for all. (This does not mean cryonics.)
I have nothing to "justify". I have no stories or headlines to invent (or reason to do so). My only interest is in what works for me. If something doesn't work, I have no interest in it (and little interest in something of less than maximum or potential maximum value to me). (As a byproduct, since this is based on objectivity and "FIH", not anecdotal evidence or hearsay or popular / media idiocy, and I am only interested in the most fundamental processes / factors possible and methods to influence them, what works for me also works for other people.) I do not write books or newsletters, and I do not give seminars. I have no viewpoint to push, no writing / books / jobs to rationalize, no lack of self-esteem or income to justify, and am not a journalist, "media member", or "writer".
I have absolutely no desire to sell any report - or anything - to anyone who "cannot yet handle it". If you are not yet honest enough to exert the effort to grasp these methods in their one, only, full & accurate context - which is quite easy given a valid effort - (for treatment of a killer disease, aging, or otherwise), please do not order anything from me. Likewise, after such earning of an understanding, if you are not practicing "FIH" enough to then exert the minor effort necessary to use these methods on yourself or at least on others (not little bits thereof plucked out of context), please do not waste either of our time with report orders / attempted communications that will either go to waste or constitute one themselves. Where the actual (real, FIH-based, fully-integrated), not "perceived", not "quoted", success / measurable result of something is the goal, the 95-99+% of the populous [not mere 80-85%] with either a "death wish" ** or, as far as investing / business go, a "poverty wish", are - by necessity & without choice - to be avoided (see Dr. Beck references at end). (Feedback & experiences of those rationally using these and yet-to-be mentioned methods is valuable & highly welcomed however.)
I have not, as most writers, by the very definition of their occupation, taken something that could very well be explained (properly & completely) with a minimum of effort and pages and turned it into the size of a book (or meaningless / long newsletter article). Any "writing" here is not written for you "to read" but is designed to be acted upon and used by you (& me) and is conveyed in the most easily understandable format possible (to those applying any semblance of "FIH"). It cannot to date be found integrated anywhere else to my knowledge - if it were, I wouldn't have had to write it (I could just say "see such & such..."). Although you may be able to find my integrated "to-the-point" writing on the Internet some places, you cannot find anything I've written in book stores, health stores, or libraries, and I do not market these reports via the mail or television. Two small ads have been placed ever for these reports and they simply "go along" with whatever little advertising there is to find the proper people for purposes of replicating investment methods. This is the research I accumulated for myself only and for my own use on myself. Nothing herein was arrived at "for marketing or professional services" purposes or for the thought of using on anyone but myself.
** The vast majority of people may claim / convince themselves otherwise, but (rational or careful) analysis of their prolonged statistically significant actions unequivocally proves they are in error / deluded. Perhaps more accurately they consciously want one thing but unconsciously want something other than their stated purpose / desire. Real intent is determined only by analysis of actions and their effects. No one does anything of any significance to the contents of these reports "unwittingly"; there is always a reason to such statistically significant prolonged behavior whether it is understood or not. Words spoken aloud or written are next to meaningless. "Stated purposes", intentions, thoughts, other "lip-service" are the same: only the measured effect of the thought / fulfillment of the purpose / "testing" & gradual refining of the thought has any significant meaning.
Over-Popularized "Sound-Good" Rationalizations Used To Ignore the Individual's Own Responsibility For Use of This Method:
Any repetition herein is the minimal amount to achieve the desired goal - the results of the method, may be the same or similar words but in a different context, and is necessary & desirable (to the reader's results & implementation). (As all who understand "FIH" know, meaning is not just definition / words alone but dependent on the context used). The rewards for any perceived repetition will be found in the method's results. The vast majority of people chop decades or more off their potential lifespan & totally unnecessarily succumb to killer diseases due to inadequate / partial reading, "get heath / life quick" searches / thinking they can find "the answer" / all that's needed in one or two popular books on the market / therapies / doctors, & resulting half-hearted attempts at implementation. In order to do this right, it not only must be thought it is understood, it must be understood. "Insufficient time" or "it takes too long", etc. is a rationalization often used to cover up hidden failure in other areas (laziness): the topic is your life.
This method is easy & quick to understand & surprisingly easy to use. It must be viewed in its proper context - that of all available methods - not of imagined, visions of future methods that will save the non-user (of this method here) from a lifetime of medical / health laziness. If work is being done oneself in other "areas" to achieve BI [biological immortality as defined by "FIH"] / increased lifespan to get there, while the method here is not being used / "integrated" by the person, a rationalization is taking place & one's life is very probably being gambled away. If you avoid this method now in order to go on with a minimum of interference with what is consuming "all" your time now, you will very probably die completely & absolutely without necessity or valid reason before your "savior-method" is a) discovered, then b) available, then c) useable by you, then d) actually used by you, then e) has had time to have its effects in you. No valid reason exists why the method here should not be used. Every day that this report (and others) remain "unintegrated" to / by the person is a day he must be counted on as chopping off more than that one single day from his life. This chopping takes the form of unnecessary suffering / death / doctor, hospital & death industry fees. Such rationalizations are an efficient way to fulfill the death wish / commit suicide however.
Any (honest) M.D. or other health specialist has his own set of "pet" treatments he likes to (most often hastily) prescribe which are based on his own clinical observations typically combined with a large amount of guess-work / specialized / other-research-ignoring bias. Thrown into this mix then is maybe a small dose of "outside-the-office-or-head" research typically based on popularity and social-acceptability in either the alternative or mainstream medical context / "community in which he lives". He also then typically has a long list of therapies he is ignoring or simply won't try because - in addition to the other reasons identified herein - they might replace or could be better than his standard "pet" treatments. (Pet treatments that must be guarded against replacing typically at all costs are antibiotics, cough syrups, beta-blockers, acid-controllers, so-called "AIDS drugs", etc.). Even the possibility of the abandonment of his "pet" / "off-the-shelf", generalized / "drug company pre-supplied" / "fast-food" treatments would be connected in his mind to a perceived invalidation of his years of "clinical practice" (i.e. observed results + guesswork / popular "sound-good" / "make-a-buck [not just for him]" theories).
The reports here and information therein are not about a prescription for any disease and are not intended to be used by anyone as a prescription for any disease or condition. They (reports, information therein) are instead an identification of rational treatment options, no matter how much mysticism / widespread "purposeful" ignorance / rationalizations may surround them. Such identification is only made possible via the prior separate identification of current widespread medical mysticism.
Even so, the therapies and information identified herein bare no resemblance to those even identified, let alone used, by the typical M.D. or health professional.
Use of These Reports
Although hospitals themselves are now beginning to be widely accepted as a major cause of death and unnecessary illness (by leading doctors themselves, Dr. Douglass of "Second Opinion" newsletter fame included) and a simple visit to a doctor's or dentist's office can be dangerous to your health, I in no way hint - as some people like to "interpret" - that any of the therapies listed herein should be used blindly without a good reason or by questionable self-diagnosis. In no way do I recommend ANYONE blindly use any of these therapies without 1) a good reason (which includes but is not limited to knowing what you're doing) and 2) proper medical supervision (ideally by one or more doctors without the biases identified herein).
These treatments, while the most non-toxic of any generally available should be used to treat or prevent a specific condition they have already shown effectiveness against (or are thought to be useful against in extreme life / health-threatening circumstances). Despite the title of some of the books & materials referenced, the therapies are neither "miracles" nor "cure-all's" to be used irrationally, blindly, or stupidly, although those using these reports may come close to the latter ("remission-alls") when rationally (properly & completely) applied. FULLY KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING BEFORE YOU DO IT. (Otherwise, you - not me - are taking the meaning of these reports completely out of context!)
What follows is an integration and summary of mostly ignored, ill-understood treatment methods, NOT specific individualized recommendations or medical advice. Anyone considering use of the therapies herein should consult the references as well as a competent medical doctor prior to and during any use.
This publication is written, sold and should be read with the following understanding. 1) the author and publisher do not engage in specific medical, legal, or professional recommendations, advice, prescriptions, diagnosis, treatment, training or services. 2) The author and publisher will be held harmless, not responsible, & not liable for any results or believed or alleged results, directly or indirectly, of a reader's or users use or misuse, understanding or misunderstanding of enclosed information / any report. 3) The reader / user using or misusing these reports acts entirely of his / her own responsibility in using information herein / in any report. And 4) even though meticulously researched and written to ensure accuracy and completeness of information herein / in any report, the information / report may not be infallible and therefore no responsibility for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies will be assumed by the publisher or author.
Especially - but not limited to - any dietary and energy balancing therapies, this is mainly a review, and you cannot possibly attempt either without the full necessary details found only in the referenced books / materials! Unknowledgeable self-diagnosis or similar treatment is not the purpose here and can be just as dangerous to health as the blind following of inferior advice from an association-happy M.D.
What You Must Do - Understand the Nature of Gambling / Physical & Business Death & Suicide
To understand your own role in slowing your own aging process, aging must be considered as "the killer disease" which will kill you. There are no if's / and's / or's / but's about it; it is only a matter of time and then it or one of its complications will get you. Within the context of aging, the heart diseases, cancers, delayed physical reactions resulting in accidents, the killer diseases, etc. that go along with it must be considered as the result of the aging process: they wouldn't have killed you when you were younger. Obviously, unless only a short 2-4 decades of usable quality life are enough for you, you need to devise a method to slow (& then another to stop / reverse) the process of aging itself - not the individual killer diseases which is a separate subject and can be done by different methods which do not affect the fundamental process of aging. You're not going to be around very long if you don't. A "normal" lifespan may be acceptable to the masses, but it is completely inadequate to those who understand & practice the philosophy of "fully integrated honesty".
Next you must understand the nature of a method for predicting future results: no one can see into the future: no one / no method is omni-present. They / it can only predict future events to a certain probability. This means you must be extremely careful in designing / choosing your "method": you cannot gamble - you must only do things that are safe - things that are going to result in the maximum chance, as known now, of your future event happening. You must eliminate chances and fix "the odds" in your favor as best as they can be fixed because you don't know (without lifespan studies in humans of your method) that what you are doing now will be successful then. And you won't for another 25-100 years. You can measure signs of aging over possibly 5-10 year periods, but any real evidence will take a lot longer. And by the time you then see your evidence / proof in yourself (as opposed to other people you are not) it might be too late to do anything about it / apply new methods if your very "first" one chosen then doesn't "seem" to be working.
Therefore, "safe" in this context can only mean the same thing it means for anyone dying of any killer disease. Your disease IS still a killer disease: by definition this means if you do nothing or do what's "accepted" / "trade union approved" you will be killed by it - you will have no chance because you're doing what "everybody" else is doing - and they're still dying of it.
If you grasp "FIH", you will immediately understand that if it hasn't been done "for you" already by government / academically funded / popular research, you have to take responsibility for yourself and your own life: the government, external businesses, academia and other people in general are not you - they have little interest in what happens to you compared to your own rational self-interest. Society obviously isn't interested very much in the length of your life; it is interested in the length if its own life - of the species at best and, needed appearances aside, generally couldn't care less what happens to you. You're "just one person" and you're not "it". Same for the evolutionary process: it exists by "subjugating" the individual to work for it / fulfill its end.
Governments, society, and groups in general exist by controlling individuals and making the individuals serve them; this is a fundamental conflict of interest when a population of "uncontrolled" individuals have control over their own lives. After the first 25-30 years or so of life, historically no human serves any significant purpose to natural evolution, the species, genetic characteristics, etc. Evolution thus has not bred any characteristics (of the kind you're interested in) into the species to keep aging or killer diseases at bay much after that time.
For anyone applying fully-integrated honesty, this means it's time to take action on your own, by & for yourself. What this means is, again, by definition, in using / devising any method to control your own aging and killer diseases, you are your own researcher. You use rational self-guidance.
This is a life and death situation and Reality; "thoughts" on the functioning thereon can be worse than meaningless when off even in small amounts. Never do you count on anything to work simply or otherwise because it's "thought" to work or "seems" to work. Nevertheless, you must ensure the desired end result as best as you can because your life literally depends on it. This means you always have multiple back-up plans. And you probably institute at least some of them simultaneously to your current "method" - the one you think has the best probability of doing the trick.
Basis of Doctors' Prescriptions
In prescribing therapies even to critically ill people, the basis of choosing what to prescribe is fundamentally in almost all cases that which is politically approved - not that which gives the patient the best chance for life. In order to generally publish a study (and to be "accepted"), it must be double-blind. That is, 1/2 of the dangerously ill / dying patients receive a placebo (nothing disguised in pill form). In any serious killer disease, only a complete fool would allow himself only a 50-50 chance of even receiving treatment just so others can "study" the effect of a single drug, etc.
In addition and aside from such studies, in contrast to prescribing one or a few politically accepted drugs, an honest M.D. (e.g. as Atkins relates in "Health Revolution") will prescribe many more substances (a combination therapy of at least rationally promising substances) in a life/death case. Such an M.D. will not accept "approved" results that almost certainly - or certainly - equal death if the condition is allowed to deteriorate / "run its own" course. "That course" is determined by the species, the natural evolutionary process, the government, the trade unions - anyone & anything but the individual dying of it (aging, cancer, etc.). The long term success rate in otherwise little-hope situations with these rational "unapproved" combination therapies can be very high (see "Health Revolution", Clark, Beck, and others).
Because not as much is known about such "unapproved" treatments, NON-TOXIC substances (drugs or usually nutrients) are generally chosen for rational combination therapies.
The point is not approval or "doing one's duty"; it is nothing but the survival (successful treatment) of the patient. In a cancer case for example, it is totally impossible to reconcile the opposing attitudes of 1) ignoring the value of those therapies identified herein (see also full Lifespan Report) and in the cancer report, and rational unapproved combination therapies - ignoring them by either the use of the "silent 'treatment'" or "name-calling" [see Heart Disease Report] - and 2) a genuine fundamental overriding, first and foremost purpose and desire to keep the patient alive. (How about well?)
It's really just a question of honesty.
Find A Doctor Who Will Live As Long As You
In addition to doctor's offices and hospitals being dangerous and non-integrated places to be, with meaningful test results frequently being sabotaged by inefficiency, contradictory patient instructions, general laziness, mixing up of patient test results, misdiagnosis, and occasional extreme bias, 90-99+% of all doctors are notoriously non-objective. Indeed, as pointed out by Dr. Wallach, author of "Dead Doctor's Don't Lie" book & tapes discussed below (I don't know if I would have called it the same, but I'm not him, and it is correct), the "lifespan" of the average medical doctor is as low as his objectivity. And these are the people treating you for killer diseases and aging.
(The large decades difference quoted by Wallach in average lifespan between the M.D.'s and the population in general was probably due to a statistically insignificant sample size originally used by Wallach. However, the point is still valid, and other studies have shown declining death rates when doctors go on strike in various countries. Doctors should not have a shorter lifespan than the overall population yet that is irrelevant now because they do. Doctors should have a significantly longer lifespan than the overall population. They should know better than the overall population they treat.)
(Their success rate in their favorite pastime - "investing" via their brokers and mutual fund managers - is even considerably more dismal in my estimate than their success in remaining alive and in good health. I'm sure most do fine by popular standards. However, following the herd instinct - choosing "the right fund" or broker to manage things for them - is not what I can call investing.) (And dentists have the highest rate of suicide - a known result, along with "Mad Hatters Syndrome" & general stupidity, of mercury poisoning - of any profession in the world.*) Indeed, a surprisingly high number of M.D.'s actions even in the operating room can only be explained by alcohol &/or drug addiction.
It may seem difficult at first, but you must find one who is in that top 1% or so if you intend to slow aging or avert killer diseases. (The full lifespan report will help you in that area. It recommends multiple sources for M.D.'s likely to be the most objective, but ultimately, the responsibility for judging the objectivity of a doctor rests on your own visits with him and judging him on his use of the therapies identified in these reports, his attitude, and his neo-cheating ploys. The doctor could just as well be a "her", but for brevity I'll say "him".)
* There may however be a profession with even higher suicide rates than dentists. There is another highly irrational / literally insane group of "professionals". They are the direct unprotected handlers of massive amounts of mercury in those primitive out-of-control violent operations that use the mercury to attract gold in the Amazon river basins. The gold is separated via vaporization. The mercury (one of the most toxic substances known to man for which even the Environmental Protection Agency of the U.S. lists as unsafe at any level) is then "naturally" released into the river, soil & atmosphere with no clean-up attempted or possible. (It's more "cost-effective" in certain circles to let people die and become diseased from it than it is [to them] to clean it up.)
As a result, no untested nutritional supplement / food including at the least otherwise very beneficial cats claw can be rationally regarded as safe when it originates from the Amazon or any region where this practice is employed. The substance must be rigorously tested with the Clark device as well as standard analysis for mercury in order to be proven otherwise. (Of course virtually no supplement or food is tested with the Clark or similar device. And many aren't tested for mercury even by standard analysis.)
The Amazon situation is continuing now & is the worst case of mercury poisoning in recorded history. At least 2.5 million pounds of mercury have been dumped over a ten year span - far greater than that used in the U.S. by that last bastion of suicidal & irrational tendencies clothed in professional apparel - the dental industry in general. This "cost-effective" practice results in at least an equal amount of mercury pollution as gold gained. Large scale debilitating / death-causing health problems have existed for years in the mining areas and affect people worldwide due to massive contamination via ocean & atmosphere, eventually in drinking water, food, & air breathed in at far away locations. North American fish & waters are also widely polluted. However, the Amazon situation is far worse by a factor of 10 or more than the most widely reported Japanese factory dumpings from the 50's. The 1950's Japanese dumpings still cause irrationality, stupidity, disease, death, & debilitation in people today. (No, the Amazon problem is not due to lack of government intervention. It's due to stupidity which is then greatly enhanced & perpetuated by the physiological effects of mercury.)
FROM DIRECT REPEATED OBSERVATIONS OVER A PROLONGED PERIOD OF TIME, ONE OF THE MOST PREDICTIVE INDICATORS OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR, or success / failure in any worthwhile endeavor, I HAVE YET FOUND IS THE NUMBER, SIZE, & AGE OF "SILVER" DENTAL FILLINGS. And this is within the context of "FIH" acquaintances. I have not begun to test everyone dealt with for mercury in other body areas such as intestines or in favorite foods, but maybe I should. This is an indicator I use that has proved itself in determining business associations / trustworthiness of people. (I do not practice medicine on anyone but myself.)
* Silver fillings immediately act like batteries in the presence of saliva due to their composition of metals. Despite required long-term rationalizations to the contrary by the dental trade unions, the electrical current formed even from one silver filling liquefies & vaporizes the metals used including almost half the mercury in the first 5 years. Far more toxic than alcohol or sugar, the mercury then destroys body & brain cells & processes. Further, after just 5 years, the mercury in a filling (of which it originally constitutes 50%) reacts with saliva / bacteria to form methyl-mercury which is 100 times more toxic than the original mercury & possibly the most toxic substance known to man. Just chewing on mercury fillings causes a 15,000% increase in mercury vapor (it goes unimpeded directly to the brain & lungs both where it can & does cause massive damage on its way to the bloodstream & every other part of the body).
* If "enough" mercury is present, the end results are brain symptoms such as Alzheimer's disease & death often preceded by allergies, lowered immunity, arthritis, metallic taste, loosened teeth, some symptoms of "drunkenness", lupus, angina, rapid heart beat & heart problems, violence, bizarre behavior, dizziness, fatigue, diarrhea, gum, digestive & mouth problems / inflammation, muscle spasms, tremors, candida overgrowth, excess salivation, sleep problems, hair loss, loss of taste, memory problems, blindness, paralysis, miscarriage & menstrual problems, chronic infections, mental deterioration, incoordination, birth & brain defects, depression, suicide, and emotional, neurological, & skin problems. Brushing on a silver filling is nothing more than "stirring up mercury" & "conjuring up stupidity".
* And grinding the teeth or using peroxide over the silver fillings really invites quick trouble. The only quick, effective, & reliable detoxification is with intravenous EDTA chelation and proper procedures followed for removal by a dentist who does not implant mercury fillings period. ANY oral supplement may be ineffective compared to real valid chelation which can only be administered intravenously. Supplements may also take weeks to months to years to have their chelating effects which are (very) weak vs. shots of EDTA. Selenium in particular is a mercury antagonist, but caution should be used ingesting more than 300-400mcg/ day. Organic colloidal selenium, if you can find it in reasonable amounts, may be the one of the best oral therapies and safer than inorganic selenium.
* There IS no safe level of mercury, it is extremely hazardous waste, and in the U.S. even the Environmental Protection Agency has a 'zero tolerance' policy towards it (for good reason).
* Dentists are by far the most dangerous type of "white clothed" health professional because their existence depends on pretending what they do with mouth surgery, fillings included, has no effect on the organism's health or rest of the body. Root canals similarly should be avoided at all costs regardless the presence or non-presence of mercury (see Clark). Although less specifically toxic than mercury, fluoride is also a poison that no informed person should ever allow to be used on them by any dentist, should never be drunk in water, & should never be used in toothpaste. Doctors / dentists & associated "health professionals" in general are responsible for more destruction & cost the public far more than lawyers or abusive revenue agents. They however more than adequately fulfill the average person's overriding need: his "hidden" death / failure wish instilled in him since infancy. Mercury & fluoride both greatly contribute to blind "following the herd instinct / external-authorities searches" more than any other popularly used poisons.
Self-Responsibility Needed Before Significant Damage Is Done
Anyone who has yet to realize the sheer danger - let alone incompetence - of the mainstream medical / dental profession is in need of watching Dr. Wallach's video tape, "Dead Doctors Don't Lie", before significant damage is done. (As well, recommended is the audio tape of the same name of a different seminar. Get both directly from Wallach / American Longevity - not the ones cut off at end; not one cent is derived here from any of Wallach's material. There's a shortened cassette available by 3rd parties - that's not the one being recommended here.).
Doctors &/or hospitals are needed at some time (especially for diagnosis) in spite of their sheer danger & unpredictability. The obituaries of doctors & others & newspaper articles in his books & tapes are worth noting. Dr. Wallach has performed over 17,000 animal autopsies and exposes how animals are better medically treated than humans. Animal studies are the key to extension of human lifespan & eventual elimination of aging.
Note that standard medical tests alone can & have been dangerous: unnecessary x-rays, swallowing of toxic substances, etc.
The immune system's chief gland (thymus) was routinely surgically removed in the first half of the 1900's because "it shrank during illness". Even later the thymus was destroyed by x-rays & radiation and with it went much if any chance of the lifespans talked about herein. For a very good exposure of why medicine in general - as practiced, not "as it should be" - makes a complete mockery of the concepts of "science", reason, rationality, & objectivity, read Chapter 14, "Science, Medicine and Society" (Rochlitz). Especially read under the subtitle "20th Century Medical 'Science' ", page 196, 3rd edition of his revolutionary book, "Allergies & Candida with the Physicist's Rapid Solution", Steven Rochlitz (references at end). This book is necessary regardless the presence of the diseases in its title.
Virtually everyone suffers from allergies of some sort & these are routinely misdiagnosed by non-objective medical practitioners as other diseases. It is estimated identification & either (easy, non-drug) correction or elimination of allergic substances can add up to 20 years or more to the average person's life.
The disease of mysticism (creation of problems where none previously exist) affects M.D.'s and especially all occupations involving a high degree of specialization. Thus, like no where else, it directly impacts the length and literal quality of your life. A few pages of newly edited extracts (all indented) from the heart disease report of special relevance here:
Your Doctor's Dilemma (And Yours): Shielded From Reality & Progress "For Your Own Good"
The following applies to any country: substitute your government agency names where appropriate. As an example, the U.S. will be singled out here:
If your doctor is like the vast majority, all his knowledge ultimately comes from the FDA and his "trade-union" he regularly uses to hide in, the AMA. He, of course, does "no research" on his own, leafing through an occasional trade union journal / taking vacations to attend "seminars" if he's really "on the ball". The exception is very occasionally when his own life or that of his wife / child is on the line and he knows it's time to take a trip to an overseas "clinic". (No matter what therapies he preaches, he knows their odds of success.) Stuck where he is, he is literally & largely not "allowed" to hear (or do) anything else (and keep his job). There is no freedom of speech. The fact is, he's not even "allowed" to tell you of the therapies - more rational than run of the mill prescribed ones - that would / even might save your life when no "run of the mill" therapy could. If he would, and say treat you with intravenous peroxide or ozone for a persistent infection, and he's in the U.S., and he repeated that a significant number of times, neither he nor his license would last very long at his place of "business" / employment. (Your infection probably wouldn't last very long either, but that's "irrelevant": note - intravenous oxygen therapies may be good, but there are better ways, and this statement is not specifically about AIDS).
The only freedom of speech belongs to those not directly involved with the drugs or therapies. The FDA "serves" you by monopolizing information under the guise of "protecting" you. They do not shield you from wrong information or dishonest information or right information or honest information; they shield you from information period.
The Food & Drug Administration is just that - a 'Federal' Administration that does not allow your doctor to hear of many new therapies - or even new uses of existing ones. This is because: 1) the FDA 'charges' from hundreds of millions of dollars up from one company to 'prove' to the FDA a new drug or therapy "works" (which of course, some of them don't even after approval). It then grants only those charged companies FDA 'approval' after perhaps decades. And 2) the FDA forbids any product manufacturer and seller to make 'unapproved' (unpaid for) 'claims' - that is, make any information available about how their therapy works or essentially how it even works so far in testing - regardless the reality of the situation and usually regardless how many lives are on the line.
The FDA also makes repeated blatant errors - life-costing to U.S. citizens - errors in banning / refusing approval to 'unapproved' substances such as artificial sweeteners to replace empty calorie sugar. (Sugar is possibly the most widely destructive drug in use which leads to blood sugar regulation problems, obesity, diabetes, and premature aging, heart problems and high cholesterol.) This banning is on the basis of very unscientific, context-completely-ignored 'evidence' as pointed out by Dr. Wallace in the "Reference Encyclopedia", Pearson & Shaw in "Life Extension" [not what this Lifespan Report is about], and many, many others.
Similar destructive government agencies exist in many other countries and are just as bad or increasingly so, modeling themselves after the U.S. It doesn't matter if a therapy works or doesn't work - has objective proof it works or lacks it. If it adversely impacts the profits of already profitable "accepted" therapies, or if it doesn't have a "sponsor" to put up the above sums of money over the years / decades of testing it takes, especially if it can't be patented, it is neither considered by 98+% of all doctors nor approved. And if an M.D. does something not "trade-union sanctioned" and politically-approved, he can really get into trouble. He's completely free to, but most are too lazy to "buck the system" for more than 2 minutes straight. It goes against their nature and training. That's why they spent all that time and money in medical school carving out their specialized niche in the pre-supplied job marketplace - so they don't have to "buck the system" - so they too can be a part of the system and profit from it. (Remember, I said most.) As with any specialized profession. Even if an M.D. simply does something not "economically-approved", he can count on the forfeiture of tens to more probably hundreds of thousands of dollars a year in kickbacks (from unnecessary test costs, etc.) & lost "approved" profits.
* Just because sugar is bad however does not mean one should consume artificial sweeteners. No artificial sweetener on the market exists that humans can now rationally consume: see below. "Non-contaminated" sucralose ("Splenda") (essentially unavailable in the U.S. yet widely available in other English-speaking countries for 3-5 years) may or may not be one exception. In any case, sucralose has an uphill battle against the political / economic "correctness" of aspartame particularly widespread in the U.S. like no where else. Far unlike aspartame, sucralose tastes virtually like real sugar and bears no resemblance in after taste to any other artificial sweetener. At this point, non-contaminated Stevia extract is the only safe choice, however its general "after"-taste severely limits its use despite its sweetness. [One particular form of stevia tastes much better and is useful however (see full Lifespan Report). Also one particular brand of stevia is thought to taste more acceptable at least by some people: if any reader knows anything about this including what form it is, please contact me.]
Millions, Billions Dead Due To Failure To Grasp the Nature of Progress
FDA-like agencies and their regular armed "Waco-Disaster"-like raids on "unapproved therapy" makers / sellers and the doctors who prescribe them are only one part of the problem however. There are those other than the FDA with a vested interest in keeping in-use "approved" therapies, and promising ones already "awaiting" approval, in (perpetual) use. After all, why would someone putting up the multi-multi millions, if not more, for drugs / hospital services / etc. used against a certain disease want their "investment" to go to waste just because there's (suddenly or otherwise) a better way that people - anyone & everyone - can use themselves at home even for pennies a day? One side (drug company white-collar-hoax management as identified by "FIH") feeds & uses the other side (government) and vice-versa, and both sides take action to secure their "investment" on their own. Then, the general death wish of many patients (i.e. laziness via external-authority following no matter what the cost) feeds both the drug companies and the government.
Drugs are not inherently bad and drug companies are not inherently bad either. However, what the traditional "FIH" literature out there fails to grasp thus far is, based on their side effects and toxicity to date which is based on their fundamental mode of action, it's just that 90 to over 99 percent of all drugs are either bad (&/)or improperly prescribed. That probable 99+% of drugs are both useless and dangerous when rational non-drug therapies for the same condition are grasped.
The reason drugs were used even during the 1940's & 50's & onwards against epidemics of infectious disease was solely because the above groups of "progress-delayers" had banned together to ensure they were the therapy of choice. This was totally regardless the effectiveness of non-drug therapies. Drugs have been used in the second part of the 1900's because electro-medicine and other advances already made by various people (and long ago, well, scientifically, objectively documented by many more, even by groups of other establishment M.D.'s from a major U.S. university) in the early part of the 1900's were NOT (used). Such meaningful advances - already in use earlier - if used on a wide scale in the second half of the 1900's would have rendered 95% of all drugs obsolete decades ago.
Clark testing / known presence of pollutants is not the only reason for the fundamental nature of drugs. From direct observations of their results, not only are prescription & non-prescription drugs generally toxic with myriads of side effects, many, if not the vast majority, are not even effective compared to (rational) non-drug therapies. (Overall, drugs fail to address the cause of illness and instead cover-up symptoms.)
This however does not mean all drugs are bad or should necessarily be avoided any more than it means one should fail to consult a medical doctor and have reasonable & accurate tests done periodically / take direct measurements and actually monitor ones health. Nor does it mean a hospital should be avoided if one is in genuine need of going to there (e.g. from an accident). This just means drugs should not be used as external authorities. Unfortunately, the extent of that last statement / real meaning thereof / ability to apply its "concept" in specific terms "outside the head" in Reality has remained beyond the immediate ability of comprehension for 90-99.9% of the populous. (Still, even a large portion of those reading this with supposed "FIH" backgrounds have trouble grrasping the extent to which drugs are over-used as simple external-authorities the same as alcohol, sugar, fluoride, mercury, etc.).
Even Dr. Atkins has largely tried to get his patients off drugs as of the mid/late 1980's if not also before. Certain diet, electro-medicine, and other non-drug therapies (even nutritional supplements) are far more effective than drug therapies. If something causes problems "where none exist", perhaps while it "fixes" others, or is not safe, it should not be regarded as effective in this context.
And this is aside from strong evidence, if not also proof, of widespread almost universal pollutants - far more dangerous than those in tap water - in pills / powders of any kind, drug or otherwise, processed food, and bottled liquids. In the context of aging / disease, when a drug known not to be polluted (conventional testing is meaningless in this context) surfaces that is as powerful and as safe as - to compare with other chemical substances - vitamin C in 50-150g intravenous range, or as MSM (methysufonylmethane), or as colloidal silver, or any of the other therapies mentioned herein, or when a non-polluted drug is proven to have any effect on aging (or the specific disease in question) whatsoever, compared to & not offered by those therapies identified in these reports, then & only then it can be rationally consumed.
And when a drug appears that is rationally thought to meet the above criteria, then it can be rationally considered, but not necessarily consumed. Even high doses of popular antioxidant pills even when non-polluted are ineffective as antioxidants - no effect on aging aside - versus the non-pill antioxidant therapy identified in the Master Protocol. (See "The Fully-Integrated Answer To Disease, Part I".)
The entire history of antibiotics, but one example*, is an extremely destructive misdirection. Nothing kills microbes like electro-medicine in various forms - or even like simple properly made colloidal silver - all of which were documented in the early part of the 1900's (yes, even in humans). Yet antibiotics were turned into external authorities / cure-alls only to leave an estimated current minimum 120 million people in North America alone in diminished health and suppressed immune systems with some form of yeast / microbe overgrowth as a direct result of the blatantly irrational use of antibiotics. This includes up to 70% of the populous infected with candida in the blood and up to 90% of the populous infected with the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome bug regardless outward symptoms.
* Antibiotics: many other types of popular prescription & over the counter drugs are industry-creating / perpetuating net problem causers: in particular anti-inflammatories / pain medication, diet pills (ephedrine, caffeine, theophyline, and other caffeine like compounds - aside from causing heart problems, they raise the metabolic rate which is currently equated with accelerated aging), diuretics, and cancer / AIDS / infectious disease drugs. This does not mean external-authority (popular medicine) "addicts" should discontinue such drug use without correctly & successfully substituting non-mystical (including non-contaminated) therapies. Even addressing the symptoms (via such drugs) is better in some cases than not doing anything at all to address the underlying disease (via the non-mystical therapies identified in these reports). Their shape may change, but problem-causing drugs & therapies will exist in one form or another as long as laziness and mysticism require them as "the easy way out" for short-term / appearance sake treatment. Short-term appearances will remain the basis of popular medicine as long as the concepts of length of life (which includes quality thereof) and aging remain non-integrated by the masses.
(Oxygen, magnetic field & soil deficiencies, and contamination, even of the antibiotics themselves, undoubtedly also play roles that allow antibiotics to create these "side effects".) (Antibiotics disrupt body pH, kill necessary friendly gut organisms, and breed new ever stronger strains of microbes which literally use the antibiotics as "food". The above rational therapies (electro-medicine, colloidal silver, even MSM & intravenous vitamin C) for infection and all diseases related to the functioning of the immune system do not and cannot breed similar. In 99+% of all cases, antibiotic use is now irrational & destructive, just as it was irrational & destructive in 1988 and in 1978. The nature of antibiotics has been known for decades. If you "haven't been told", the time for rational self-guidance is now.)
Viewing drugs - via "insured" ignorance - ensured by the major drug companies and government cohorts - outside of comparison to electro-medicine and other rational therapies is a complete drop of context. Drug companies like all individuals are basically good and serve a need - they should just concentrate their "advances" on electro-medicine instead of drugs. (But unfortunately, the political climate doesn't and fees charged for "advances" don't favor them doing so.)
The disease of cancer in particular (but not alone) would not be the money-maker it is today and no one informed* would have died of it since the 1920's to 1940's if treated in an informed manner in time and if a long chain of "progress-delaying" action had not been taken to keep drugs the treatment of choice beginning mainly in the 1930's. (What constitutes the nature of progress is spelt out below under "How To Verify These Statements & Determine Which Therapy Is Actually Best For Your Condition".)
* This "research opinion" means, had they been properly informed, in-context, in time death / debilatation would have been totally unnecessary had they opted to prevent it or treat it before it got out of hand. The problem is with the information & the information sources.
Those Who Choose To Integrate These Reports Will Come To Understand & Accept The Following "Research Opinions":
- any cancer treatment with less than a 95-100% rate of "complete long-term / permanent remission from all symptoms", or one with toxicity or undesirable side effects, or one that one is not entirely & easily usable on oneself by oneself at virtually no cost at home, is inadequate and mystical,
- any infectious disease treatment with less than a 95-100% rate of "complete long-term /permanent remission from all symptoms" or one with toxicity or undesirable side effects - including AIDS / HIV / candida / E. bola / chronic fatigue, etc. - (with same usability & cost stipulations as above) is inadequate and mystical, &
- any heart, artery, or blood pressure treatment with less than a 90-100% rate of complete prevention and almost certainly the same rate of "complete long-term / permanent remission from all symptoms" (if caught in time before too much unnecessary damage is allowed to be done - the same as in the cancer & infectious disease situations) - or one with toxic or undesirable side effects - is inadequate and mystical (the creation of problems where none exist).
Acceptance is irrelevant. Approval of others is irrelevant. Livelihoods of those in the medical / etc. profession are irrelevant. Grant money & "academic" "job creation" are irrelevant. Trade unions are irrelevant. Only the results & actions of those individuals with a (valid) reason to cause such a "remission" in themselves are relevant because only life & death count (theirs).
Unpracticed "Focusing", Continuing To Avoid The Issue, & Steadfast Refusal To See The Point:
Focusing on antibiotics, mis-prescribed drugs, the FDA, singling out AZT & other AIDS drugs as "causers" of diseases, non-self-guidance, the government, vague "neocheaters", & white collar hoaxes is akin to gasping & covering ones eyes and refusing to see the original explanation that the earth revolves around the sun. It avoids the fundamental problem.
As anyone who has "integrated" & tested Dr. Clark's books knows from their own prolonged repeated results [now even verifiable by expensive mainstream tests] (see "The Cure For All Diseases", etc. below), well over 75%-90% of all marketed pills, powders, processed foods & bottled drinks are contaminated. They are contaminated with minute previously "undetectable" quantities of immune system destroying, disease-causing, extremely toxic substances. These substances undoubtedly at the very least lay the foundation for microbe / parasite infestation by disrupting the body's biological terrain. [See the Master Protocol for better ways to restore proper biological terrain than painstaking "pollution hunts"]. According to Clark, such pollutants also lay the foundation for cancer, AIDS, infections, etc. [According to her, certain pollutants + parasites cause disease, and you can't get the specific disease without the right type of each.] Such substances are typically solvents like benzene, propyl alcohol, etc. and heavy metals. This is irrespective of the label / seller's claims which are as wrong almost as often as recommendations and claims from the FDA and medical trade unions (not a valid excuse for FDA attacks on such sellers however).
These books have been very widely available in both health & general book stores since 1995. Clark was then of course sued "by the manufacturers" in a rigged court case in which she was not allowed to defend herself, and the court cases against her seem to continue indefinitely in an overly obvious effort to discredit, silence, & rationalize away the message contained in her books. As to be expected, she now has a clinic in Mexico like so many others, but that in no way stops the attacks on her books contents.
Just because the mere concept of something is right bears no (safe to presume) resemblance whatsoever to the actual thing / implementation thereof being right. Anything that can be done well can be cheapened via laziness & mysticism to the point of ruin & disaster.
Overall, the manufacturing processes used to make mass-marketed processed foods & products are extremely dangerous to health, and many people have recovered or greatly improved health as a result of identifying & avoiding such contamination. Widespread contamination (poisonous plastics included) of drugs & processed chemicals / substances / foods / drinks / health & home care products is the problem. (Drugs singled out as harmful - specific ones included - are drops of context that cause focus to be diverted away from the real cause and issue. "The real issue" of widespread disease-causing contamination even if thought to be understood is not applied to "specific instances" by the overwhelming majority of those "aware" of it. The real problem goes much deeper than people will admit.)
(Depletion of essential nutrients in soil, depletion in the atmosphere of oxygen, resulting lowered immunity, & possibly other things such as cattle feeding practices are also problems in the context of parasite / infection overgrowth.)
In the absence of such testing as can only be done using the Clark method or similar approach - not traditional methods [now changed: see Master Protocol subtitle] - until manufacturers (& consumers) hands can be pulled out from in front of their eyes, only 2 rational options exist. 1) Avoid all such items, or 2) learn to make ones own products. [Known sources are named for generally contaminant-free products in part II of this lifespan report & also in "The Fully-Integrated Answer To Disease, Part I", both of which must be ordered].
In addition, many people are sensitive or allergic to many ingredients regardless whether they are poisons (see Rochlitz, NAET later). The type of testing Clark uses can be done for live organisms just as easily as inorganic substances and can pinpoint the location in the body of each substance.
Furthermore, a large % - if not all - of vaccines & doctor / nurse administered shots are now thought to be dangerous. Not only can they contain solvents and heavy metals but have a "history" of being routinely contaminated with cancer & other disease-causing microbes.
In the 50's & 60's almost an estimated 100 million people in the U.S. alone** were inoculated with contaminated vaccines containing cancer-causing viruses like SV-40 "in order to protect them from polio". (It may have "protected" the "unlucky" recipients from polio, however other things known decades prior could have done it better and certainly without "causing more problems"). The vaccines were extracted from monkeys and along came the virus until the mid 60's. Even if these did not cause cancer in everyone, they surely contributed greatly to some "related" health problems in a large number if not all of those inoculated - whether increased infections, lowered immunity, reduced lifespan, diabetes, heart disease, etc.. All of these diseases can easily develop from having the immune system "pre-occupied" in the face of the continual onslaught of parasites / microbes and contaminants.
SV-40 alone is now thought to be infecting at least 50-60% of all current cancer patients and 20-40% of normal people. Only transmission from the injected to other people can explain this - during sex and pregnancy.
(As long as it is a normal virus, i.e. not a prion, it is easy to "kill", and many microbes are "activated" into cancer only when combined with a particular pollutant. Clark is not the only one who points this out; published studies have proven it). (And then there are the "radiation [and no doubt a long line of other] so-called experiments" conducted in doctors offices, hospitals, and generally throughout the atmosphere / soil without the consent of the "test subjects". This includes "radioactive cow's milk and food", reports of which began to receive heavy press in the U.S. in the early 90's. [Fulvic acid is claimed to be able to clean up at least some contamination.])
** Some estimates of the total number of people given SV-40 alone are 500 million; the virus is not necessarily present in the tumors it causes. The contamination of vaccines with animal microbes is now thought to produce genetic changes in humans. Regardless whether they are mandatory for inclusion in "free social programs", all vaccines are unnecessary and the creation of problems where none exist - irrespective of whether they directly lead to cancer or debilitating disease later in life or in ones offspring or only cause lowered immunity, lack of energy, headaches, colds, allergies, food intolerances, digestive problems, & flus. Microbe-"inspired" diseases (they don't actually cause disease, but that's another point, rather they take advantage of the run-down environment) are proven easily & quickly mitigated or "remissed" when the therapies identified in this report and the "The Fully-Integrated Answer To Disease, Part I" are properly integrated. (As with anything worthwhile, half-hearted incorrectly followed protocols by those seeking to fulfill their "death/failure wish" do not count - but these therapies are easy to anyone serious). Such mitigation or remission does not undo any genetic damage already done by the microbes however. Among other sources, see "Leading Edge Research" articles at www.trufax.org/v2.html & www.trufax.org/v5.html.
[There is now a new independently developed method of using the Clark testing device that many may find easier to use than the widely published one - see specifics in part II of this Lifespan Report.]
Even Atkins Accuses
Recently, even Dr. Atkins has publicly accused "leading" cancer researchers of suppressing multiple - not one, not two - but "many" "cures" for cancer alone, not treatments, not "remissions", etc., etc. See what he says about it: visit www.rarebooks.net/beck, click on "Related Articles" then "Famed Doctor Accuses Leading Cancer Fighters of Suppressing Cures". The last paragraph there on Dr. Atkins' "advice" for cancer patients & their families is especially relevant. (After this, his list of nutrients are fine, but not a "cure" or "remission" anything like the topic in question and far from optimal in themselves).
His clinic prefers cancer patients who have not been treated with radiation, or chemotherapy. Indeed, such conventionally-treated patients may die significantly quicker than those "untreated" by standard procedures. Standard treatments (radiation, etc.) destroy the immune system. How can a patient with cancer combat the disease lacking an intact immune system? Many including Dr. Hardin Jones claim to have statistics proving surgery, radiation & chemotherapy shorten the lifespan of cancer patients when compared to those "avoiding" them. This has been obvious for decades.
Members of the long-lived populations of the world (see Wallach), generally do not die of cancer. They clearly illustrate the illusion of dependence on doctors, hospitals, drugs, pills, let alone chemotherapy, radiation, & surgery. (There is no valid reason to blame their success on "genetics".)
In 1993 Dr. Atkins made headlines for losing his medical license. His supposed crime was telling a cancer patient to continue ozone therapy (nothing more than oxygen infusion already proven safer than virtually every drug on the market for half a century) as it's widely used in Germany. 5 Days later Atkins got his license back. "Everyone" was told he lost it and ozone didn't work on the front page of the USA Today, CNN specials and other major US networks. No one was told by the same sources he got it back 5 days later because to do so would have been an admission of official fraud and expose the same media "sources" and politicians caught in an obvious scare tactic. Ozone was deemed to be the current "competition" to "something". Could it have been to the hundreds of millions of dollars in FDA new drug "fees" (for each drug) despite a long history of undeniable success and safety in Germany? Could it have been similar profits in new drug promotions?
Oxygen Wars / Objective Healing and Reporting Now As Political Crimes
Every major English-speaking country seems to follow the lead of the U.S. which is the most "gung-ho" in this regard. To use the U.S. again as an example, not only has the discoverer of "FIH", Dr. Wallace, been harassed and in and out of prison framed with "tax" charges, the person most responsible for publicly exposing oxygen therapy, "Mr. Oxygen", Ed McCabe, is, as of April 1998, being held in the Syracuse County Jail, New York on equally invalid charges. (Unless he's been moved to a more "secure" facility that is - i.e. one where people can't call because they don't know where he is.) His real "crime": in his own words, "investigative medical journalism". The purpose according to him and many others: to intimidate, discredit, and threaten him until the public no longer thinks what he's been saying all these years is right and he stops saying it. A smear campaign just like the lower level one waged against Atkins and others.
The goal is clearly to attack him and take advantage of his weakened state, ignoring the fundamental message of his appearances / writing until he is no longer taken seriously on talk shows and lectures. His story / plea for help** is hard to read without thinking he's also been fed full of lies by his disguised attackers in the hopes he repeats some of them in an effort to further ruin his reputation.
McCabe interviewed many recovered patients and doctors all over the world and widely circulated documentation of AIDS / cancer reversals. The real trouble for him started when he testified in a U.S. court against the framing of another U.S. M.D., Dr. James Boyce, now jailed for eliminating AIDS (including all symptoms) in the U.S. in 100+ patients.
In the U.S. particularly, but around the globe, the only words that can accurately describe people like Wallace, McCabe, Boyce, etc. [now even Clark for a short time] - people responsible for telling the public "what they are not supposed to hear" and for (correctly) administering these treatments are, "political prisoners".
Even of those not jailed, Atkins was forced to abandon ozone use and M.D.'s in general are too afraid of the FDA, etc. to admit to its use / knowledge thereof / the multitude of studies thereon let alone testify in trials designed to frame other doctors. This is despite ozone's wide use and track record in Germany for over 50 years.
Legally, in the U.S. only N.D.'s, naturopathic doctors, can use oxygen therapies without the risk M.D.'s face of being harassed into non-existence & imprisonment. M.D.'s, medical doctors, can't use oxygen without such risk, but many N.D.'s seem scared into submission as well. [Late 1999: Now out on bail until Jan-Feb 2000, Clark, now in her 70's, was recently dragged across the U.S. and jailed for "prescribing medicine" (her zapper, herbs) & "diagnosing disease" - even though she possesses a license to do so in the form of an N.D. .... ANYTHING to discredit that can be done, will be done]
Ozone and intravenous / oral peroxide could be suppressed because they required injections and medical supervision. Hence those administrating it or even M.D.'s talking about it could easily be attacked. Also, such therapies can be dangerous - but, like virtually everything already used in established medicine, only if used improperly. There is a well established wide range between improper and correct use making ozone far safer than almost all traditional therapies. [I have (my own) "Master Protocol" however, so I still don't use it on myself (no need). Ozone / peroxide should not be used by anyone without fully knowing what they are dealing with - rocket fuel in its concentrated form. It should be administered by a qualified responsible doctor in most to all cases. Those considering its use, or the use of any oxygen therapy should see what the "Master Protocol" section of "The Fully-Integrated Answer To Disease, Part I" says about it.]
** Partly because of his lack of "FIH" orientation, he asks for help and donations, his current mental state does not look good, and McCabe claims to have almost died repeatedly recently. The way he sounds now, it will end in the same situation as Rife (below) except that far too many people are already aware of the subject and facts now thanks mainly to him and Dr. Donsbach.
Like the framing, jailing, & repeated murder attempts on Basil Wainwright for inventing a machine that extracts patient's blood, ozonates it, then immediately returns it to circulation, any attack on oxygen therapies now, no matter how thinly disguised is a rapidly losing war becoming self-evident to the public at large. Attempts at jailing / framing / reputation ruining / discrediting / and more with subjects so obvious to the public are backfiring and only making the public more interested in the therapies themselves and what's going on with those like McCabe. Mr. Wainwright has now made it out of various U.S. jails and his confiscated machines have now been successfully used to eliminate AIDS and other diseases in Africa on a large scale - but not in "civilized" western societies.
The non-sequiturs surrounding McCabe's current state (some of them seemingly planted there to divert attention away from his message) are irrelevant and to be ignored; only his objective original message counts. Despite any current / personal problems and lack of "FIH" orientation, McCabe's oxygen reporting is objective where others are not, accurate, and very good. See www.oxytherapy.com/oxyfiles/oxy00033.html for an historical documentation of these attempts. See especially "Ask Mr. Oxygen With Ed McCabe" dates: 26 June 91, 1 January 92, 16 June 92, 1 April 93, 5 Nov. 93, and 4 May 94. See other pages at the site for details regarding McCabe's "silencing".
Fortunately, there is such a thing as progress.
If doctors, FDA-like government agencies, pharmaceutical industries, non-integrated large corporations, & universities cannot be depended on to make progress, progress forms around them enveloping them like a properly functioning immune system envelopes cancer and eliminates any required dependence on them. (Until they get their "act" in gear and are literally forced to accept progress.)
Progress then occurs not due to them but due to the individuals in need of saving their own lives (those to whom political economics have no relevance and to whom only [their own] results count. These few then attack their own problem at the "real" / fundamental / results-driven level unhampered by the massive creation of problems where none need exist. Because they are forced to attack their own problem at the non-mystical, fundamental level, their successful results are typically universally applicable exposing up to multiple industries at once as little more than the net creation of problems where none exist).
Now more is known about oxygen and there may be a much better way to raise body oxygen levels without having to introduce it directly via injections / drinking / bathing / breathing / etc.. This is without dependence on any M.D.'s involvement / approval of any political organization to "normalize" ones own oxygen levels / or even any machine or device whatsoever. And it's without expensive oxygen tanks. Of course, if one wants to use those other far more invasive approaches, that's "fine"; but recent (mainstream) research strongly indicates they may not be necessary. (See "The Fully-Integrated Answer To Disease, Part I".)]
Why 99% of the Populous Has Not Heard of This Before (One Reason) /
The main current proponent of electro-medicine, Dr. Beck, has even reported being physically assaulted (in "old age") & bloodied for his grasp of rational medicine. This was by an "AIDS activist" who didn't want him to speak. The venue has reportedly threatened with being burned down in the midst of this.
Although not the government or pharmaceutical industry (directly), this only goes to show the extent of the "death industry". It could have easily been instigated by anyone. It is a case of someone with a "vested interest" ("death wish") taking action to ensure some desired end: "the easy way out" / sympathy / hospitalization / free care / continuous influx of income / (fake) "jobs" in the form of donations / grants / "free" public money "necessary" to conduct "perpetual" totally unnecessary ridiculously expensive "research" for the "public good" / "treatment" consisting of poisonous drug "cocktails" costing absurd amounts / other standard AIDS drugs that have never added one net day to any patient's life. Beck has also reportedly been raided / harassed by the FDA for nothing but his status as a "researcher" / speaker. He is widely recognized as very (rationally) cautious of more drastic FDA harassment.
Others have had themselves or their research subjected to extreme harassment or worse - far more than has ever been reported against Dr.'s Atkins or Beck. Scientific papers and related books are regularly cut out / removed from libraries even in North America, even in the 1990's, and certain newspaper / periodical articles are said to be not available / not exist shortly after they come out. Certain countries like Singapore have their own version of the Internet, and anything their residents " are allowed" to see is well edited with much removed / inaccessible beforehand.
Despite any philosophical errors, again in the U.S., Dr. Kelley (see "The Fully-Integrated Answer To Disease, Part I") reports perhaps the most abuse (from 1970 on) of anyone alive. In addition to the usual intimidation tactics and smear campaign involving various local and federal government agencies and the media, among his reports are having his house burned down, various poisonings inducing seizures, most / all medial records destroyed, pets killed, attempted shooting, supplies sabotaged, and having to flee the U.S. to set up his clinic in Mexico (now where Dr. Clark is).
Whether all of Dr. Kelley's "adventures" actually happened or not, the experiences of the many following his program cannot be denied - only ignored. Perhaps it wasn't deemed "socially acceptable" to have a dentist writing books that claimed to have figured out what cancer really is and to show a 93% success rate against it (first published 1967). 93% success rate that was on greater than a reported 30,000 cancer victims.
Dentists aren't "supposed" to do that. That's the "job" of multiple other industries centered around "approval", governments & white-collar hoaxes (to comparatively or otherwise "assist" in the "suicide" of such patients). Whether it worked or didn't work, and was safer beyond possible comparison than "industry" "assisted suicides", didn't "matter". After 31 years, still, none of that "matters". Whether a dentist had a cure for cancer or not didn't matter. The only things that "mattered" - or matter to this day - were that he didn't have "approval" "to engage in those activities" (or to tell people about them in a book) & that he was a dentist. That's all that "mattered" - or continues to "matter" - in this case.
(Since the book was published, there have been reports of an overall 80-87% or more success rate at other "offshore" clinics using his general approach. General "adaptations" it must be stressed are neither his approach nor his method and only contain elements thereof.)
This is only one example. There are a variety of treatments either rationally reported or already proven to cause complete remissions / total reversals or at least be extremely successful against diseases like cancer. If either 16 or 21 AIDS end stage cancer patients are taken (as they have been), after traditional medicine has "given up" on them for dead, and a "complete 'spontaneous' remission and freedom from all symptoms" is found in every single patient ("cared" to be) given a certain therapy, and it happens very shortly thereafter, it is called "an extremely successful treatment". (The 'spontaneous' part does not mean by chance then.) No traditional / non-self-guided therapy can come close to such results perhaps giving a 20% chance for life at best (chemo-"therapy's" "success" alone is 7% after 5 years - and even this may be "doctored" to show increased benefit).
I can think of two such studies off the top of my head that have already accomplished the above "remission" in every single patient, one even by the medical establishment itself. The results were indisputable & proven - they were also unpatentable approaches so there was "insufficient reason" "for anyone to tell you" - especially in a way that might significantly impact the up to one billion U.S. dollar a week medical / drug / hospital / doctor / pharmacy / FDA / funeral / assisted & rationalized suicide industry [see "The Fully-Integrated Answer To Disease, Part I"]. (That latter rationalized part refers to the ultimate role / purpose of no less than 95+% of all hospitals / drugs / doctors / pharmacies in actions & in practice. They are not inherently bad and they should in fact be beneficial. It's just the way they choose to "act" that can only be called "bad" - it's a "behavior problem".)
There has even been an establishment approved study of 143 people: in 1994 a U.S. company, Genetronics, received FDA "approval" to treat skin cancer with electro-medicine at the University of South Florida - 90+% complete tumor regression was reported (www.genetronics.com). How long will this take to be "usable": if history is any lesson, quite awhile and X amount of deaths more before any doctor will talk about using it on you. On top of that, it's already 60+ years too late for X number of people. (It will wait until society & the majority of people in general no longer need to depend on cancer & other incurable diseases for use in carrying out their "death wish". That is, it will until a) they no longer have a death wish [not forseeable near future], or b) [much more probable] better, more "efficient" avenues can be found / created with which to accomplish the unconscious / unspoken goal of death / failure / perpetuation of laziness.)
Regarding new complicated approval-based technology however, similar results both have been reported, proven, and should be "theoretically" (see below under "Basis of Reading / Treatment") obtainable at home, administered by yourself, on yourself, for pennies a day, with a device built by yourself given simple instructions or gotten from someone paid to make it - in the simplest, easiest manner possible - without unnecessary, unnatural dependence on anyone or their approval, without herbs, drugs, surgery, pills, "bills", etc., etc.. (I do not give out the instructions myself, nor make them, nor am I affiliated with Dr. Beck, Dr. Clark, or anyone who does - I simply use them on myself & do not have to "cover my eyes" when I come face-to-face with them.)
No where is the damage [from the creation of problems where none exist] / warped sense of "profit motive" / warped sense of capitalism & business easier to see than in the diseases like cancer. The average medical industry charges often exceed US$300,000 per cancer patient. (One reason why there is medical insurance.) And then the patient still dies soon afterwards unless a shot-in-the-dark "spontaneous remission" occurs later attributed "to chance".
Rational treatment (legally known as "knowledgeable" research no one can stop one from performing on oneself) can occur for less than $1000 (even for virtually nothing) non-invasively on oneself. Is it any wonder why insurance companies, and then the conventional mystical treatment of cancer / the maintainers of the orthodox status quo, are perceived as external authorities that can provide some sort of "relief" (to make the hidden death wish "easier")? With "accepted" treatment's cost and demand and the desire by so-called "leading researchers" & universities for continued status quo or government provided / socially-acceptable "free" funding & "jobs", those who fail to grasp the use of "FIH" and ultimately the information identified in these reports can find some relief in the fact that a "good" insurance policy will gladly pay for it all . (Gladly, that is, should their doctors / insurance / hospitals / FDA, etc. decide "for them" they're "the lucky ones" and their 7-20% chance at life should cost them in excess of US$300,000).
The purpose of business is "to build" by solving problems, not "to maintain" by creating them. Clearly standard well-accepted treatments, their "delivery boys" dressed in white, and their places of work cannot fall under the title of business by the latter's very definition. The purpose / value of capitalism is that it is the only economic system yet devised that allows one to get what one wants without (eventual) killing of the other person (preceded by usurping / stealing from him for as long as can be gotten away with).
Clearly the cancer industry cannot by definition be called a capitalistic entity. Capitalism is based on the free exchange of values - not usurped, but free which includes "freedom" of information, "freedom" from murder - direct & indirect, "freedom" not to be directly lied to en mass by the political / social establishment or by an "entire industry" when one has an immediate life-threatening problem that needs solved, & "freedom" not to have ones health systematically suppressed with constant disinformation & misdirection. "Coincidentally", all these "freedoms" arise only out of free-competition, not out of banning, censoring, misdirecting, "policing", imprisoning, or regulating the population "back to the stone age". ("Back to the Stone Age" compared to where it would be without such interference.)
Capitalism & business have nothing to do with people profiting from death & the causing of problems / disease. If genuine capitalistic principles were adhered to, the above "actors" would be doing what they should be doing - profiting from the continuance of life / health via the actual solution of disease. Maximum rewards / profits only arise from creation of the maximum value. Ignoring all or even some past progress in order to "create" the maximum value out of thin air "all by oneself" (in order to keep all the rewards to oneself) is a "get-capitalistic-quick" scheme. Of course, it doesn't work. Hidden Hitler-like laziness and mysticism in the "actors" themselves are the cause of the perverted profiteering.
And then there's the case of the original famous "lost" "cancer remissions" of Dr. Rife.
"Why Doesn't Rife Technology Work"?
Simple: Dr. Rife died of valium poisoning administered in a hospital (after contracting medical / drug profession-induced "alcoholism" from their constant "attention" and "agreeing" to stop his work).
Although "routine" hospital / doctor errors are to be expected and a major cause of death & illness, and only an estimated half of all M.D.'s diagnoses are correct (by other doctors), there was more to this story.
His own lab was ransacked, his research effectively lost, stolen, &/or hidden, the laboratory duplicating his work in New Jersey was burned by "arsonists", another doctor duplicating his work, Dr. Nemes, was killed in another fire along with his own research. In the midst of this, there was a 100% "cure" rate proclaimed by orthodox M.D.'s themselves, and finally Dr. Milbank Johnson, president of the AMA of Southern California (American Medical Association), was determined by federal police to have been murdered by poisoning just hours prior to appearing at his announced press conference concerning his own University of Southern California team's self-proclaimed 100% "cure" rate in terminal cancer patients using a Rife device.
At a time when poisoning was a popular means of murder while alleviating responsibility for "direct" involvement (now there are more laws and the courts can be used more "efficiently" by the establishment for framing / discrediting / silencing competition), still other doctors involved were persecuted, and another doctor, Dr. Koch, was found dead of arsenic toothpaste poisoning. Further, the head of the Northwestern School of Medicine who was closely involved was never heard from again after getting hundreds of thousands of U.S. dollars (worth a lot more then) in whatever you want to call them (in academia they're known as grants). Keeping something like this out of the nice socially acceptable (& similarly funded) trade union "medical" journals that rely on advertising & lack of other journals as competition was then the simple part for the now billion dollar a week perversion of capitalism known as the drug / hospital / doctor / insurance / funeral / "death" industry.
These shenanigans took place in the 1930's (see Lynes; Royal Rife Society referenced in "The Fully-Integrated Answer To Disease, Part I"). After that, government raids, harassment & irrelevant convictions of associates further "cleaned-up" the scene.
"Why doesn't Rife work"? Simple: To those who understand "FIH", it's called neocheating (see especially the "Neo-Tech Reference Encyclopedia" by Wallace) - the same reason Beck, Clark, many others' therapies are not supposed to work or exist. They do of course exist but only to all who exert a valid effort to understand / test them).
(Such attacks are much easier seen for what they are now. However, there are still licenses, income, & social-acceptance to be lost by orthodox M.D.'s & scientists who venture "too far" through the clutches of current day mysticism. "The earth is flat and they might fall off.")
Many people use devices based on pieced-together Rife Technology, some even with great success today (on themselves, by themselves). For cancer & infectious diseases at least there are now other therapies though known to be better (more current documentation / test results / proof, easier, less expensive, not fallen victim to the same harassment). (See "The Fully-Integrated Answer To Disease, Part I".)
[Note: it is highly advantageous to health not to use any of these currently available therapies until first seeing what specifics are written on them in the "The Fully-Integrated Answer To Disease, Part I" if not also in part II of this Lifespan Report and the Master Protocol itself.]
These are just a few examples. Fortunately, progress (advances already made, tested, proven, and immediately usable by the public themselves with or without a doctor, hospital or drug company) cannot be delayed for much longer than 60 or 70 or 100 years given current communication routes.
This report is not anti-drug. Drugs have their place. It is just that based on technology in use 60 years ago - technology that people are now becoming aware of via better routes of communication - technology that has already been and is being perfected by Dr. Beck, Dr. Clark and many others for use by the average person on him/herself, drugs and surgery have very little if any rational use in the diseases of aging, cancer, AIDS, heart disease, stroke, high blood pressure, infections, and other killer diseases. This means / encompasses: the use of drugs & surgery in their current & past states, not philosophical theories, flights of fancy, or imaginations about how they "should" be used which are of no value or consequence to every dying person on the planet now. (Why now? Because they're dying now, and not from lack of future technology.) What drug companies, doctors, hospitals, insurance companies, & the government choose to do in the future with these "well-established" / "everybody knows", "staple" therapies (drugs - none of which presently address the cause of the illness - only the after-effects & symptoms) is "up for grabs". And "chemotherapy" and "radiation" have no rational non-destructive use (in living humans or animals). (Unless in a small # of cases, you cause an irrational condition by first failing to use adequate, non-mystical therapies.)
No Valid Need For New, Yet-To-Appear "Super-Advanced Savior" Technology
OR for any new as-of-yet widely unavailable technology designed to make other people money, etc. and not primarily to make you well. The need now - just as 60 years ago (albeit possibly more difficult then) is for rational self-guidance whether that takes place as a) literature research, b) original technical experiments, or c) both.
These statements presume the purpose is to successfully treat the aging / disease process in question. (See Master Protocol.) In order to successfully treat the aging process, the "researcher" must be around when stoppage of the aging process finally becomes both possible & available. This means, as it has for decades prior, the immediate killer diseases must be eradicated (in the individual) in the most effective ways currently possible. This also means, available steps, which are now 90-99+% certain, must be taken to dramatically slow the fundamental process of aging. OR yet-to-appear "savior" technology (whether for a specific killer disease OR aging) will do the individual little good.
In the context of what kills 75-85+% of the populous (cancer, heart / vascular disease, etc.), if the purpose is not to successfully treat / "completely remiss" a disease and all its symptoms, then, yes, there is a valid need for new, yet-to-appear "Super-Advanced Savior Technology"...
The nature of progress is such that it occurs as the result of the work of one individual, whether the work is all original or a rational mysticism-free integration heretofore unmade of the work of other individuals, and not the result of governments, large corporations, or similar groups of people. This is because only the individual can best or adequately control the amount of mysticism (creation of problems where none exist) injected into any research, integrated or original thinking / experimentation. Almost uniformly, the larger the organization or group, the greater the amount of mysticism / created problems present and the more adverse the effect on progress. New technology is always beneficial. However, just because there are or can be new developments (i.e. new quick & easy drug profits in the multi-millions / billions) does not mean ones made to date should be abandoned or ignored - whether "enough" money can be made from them or not.
Purposefully ignoring the nature of progress, the individual, the individual's use or the meaning of rational self-guidance, and the history of developments already / long ago made while calling for the use / research or development of "new technology" is patently irrational & fundamentally destructive (typically on a large scale). Whether such ignorance is "thought" to be on purpose or "just an accident". Similarly, ignoring the nature of progress, previous developments, etc, while "waiting" for "new technology" / R&D not yet "widely available" - as of 1998, 1995, 1975, or even decades earlier - and not yet completely & immediately usable by the average person on himself, for himself is patently irrational & fundamentally destructive (on a large scale). Whether it is decided to include any entire industry in that private use / "research" or not. Whether such ignorance is "thought" to be on purpose or "just an accident".
Any failure to (correctly) use the therapies mentioned herein for the killer diseases they are thought to be useful against, at the very least if suffering from one or more of same - while using either traditional / "everybody-knows" therapies - or while playing the "waiting game" claiming to be "holding out" for a popularly-acceptable so-called "better" answer - constitutes a failure of self-guidance and is patently irrational & self-destructive.
Basis of Reading / Treatment
In certain force-backed government states it has been made into a legal crime (and a mockery of a philosophical, ethical, moral or real crime) to use the word "cure" in connection with any "mysterious & powerful" disease "everybody" and their trade unions, university / "grant" subsisting researchers, popular "cause-concert" musicians / other "know-nothings", not to mention drug company's, all just know "can't be cured". (Otherwise, the support structure for entire major bureaucracies & industries would begin to collapse). I treat myself only with these therapies. To remain objective I do not make or sell any devices, substances, or therapies: I sell (integrated) information / knowledge only, and do not treat or advise anyone (other than myself) regarding anything.
Further, I do not want to get any of the other "researchers" or sellers of devices, etc. mentioned in these reports in any trouble they're not already in, so I will and am necessarily refer(ing) to everything here - all therapies - therefore as "research / development" and you the reader as your own personal "researcher". Although I will not repeat it every sentence or paragraph it should be clearly understood the context of anything written here, while specific, is "experimental" and "theoretical" even though some or all of it may have already been proven in rats and supported by other "researchers'" results in humans (and other parts of it proven period). After reading these reports, you may use the information to dramatically slow your own aging or experience "a complete and total remission" from cancer or negative AIDS tests (not to be confused with simple antibody tests), etc. - or rid yourself of any sign of all disease symptoms. But if you do or attempt any of those, that is legally different. You did it as a researcher on your own and I had no part of it personally other than to point you in the right direction via these reports.
It can however be said that as of mid 1998 a safe estimate is that at least 98-100% of all deaths & substantially diminished health from cancer, AIDS, 99+% of all infectious diseases & "overgrowths", heart disease, stroke, and other killer diseases are unnecessary given specific current and past technology. Technology as opposed to philosophical idealism / wishful thinking / other generalities / or waiting for any current / future "research" to pay off. And the same can be said as of mid 1997, mid 1996, and almost certainly mid 1995, mid 1994, & probably 1993 as well - if not decades earlier. What has been killing those suffering from the above diseases is an infection of the mind - mysticism, a "defeat the healer" general "death wish" as Dr. Beck puts it. This can take the form of reliance on the media / government / trade unions / hospitals / drug companies / pharmacies / health stores / popular books and everything else that can possibly be set up as external authorities to alleviate self-responsibility / "self-research". This alleviation can only result in a lack of identification & lack of application of the therapies mentioned in these reports.
This does not necessarily mean those who have already allowed their condition to deteriorate to immediately life-threatening proportions can save themselves with an instant dose of "self-responsibility" or "pre-packed external guidance" in the form of the (improper or any) use of these reports. (The ability to save themselves however does seems likely in the vast majority of all cases of those fully & properly applying these reports).
It means the condition itself is to begin with unnecessary, as it was almost certainly half a decade ago, 2 decades ago, & probably even 3-4 decades previous. It means the condition almost certainly would not be there today had these identifications and applications been made when they should have been made - when the problem first began. For those in this condition now, there is no one to thank but the external authorities used and ones' own reliance on them / lack of "research". This is the "estimate" of a "researcher".
WARNING: partial reading can be dangerous to your health. It can be dangerous - if not life-shortening period (life-shortening especially when viewed in context of other available therapies & their proper application) - to apply any therapy herein without fully grasping all points mentioned in these reports. This is regardless whether you're already using one of them. Similarly, partial reading / partial understanding of any of the quoted references at end / specific directions for any attempted therapy can be equally dangerous. This is Reality. "Partial reading" & other forms of context-dropping are what originally brought about the current unnecessary "mass-debilitation" to killer disease & aging.
SECOND WARNING: Between the above and one section of the online "Heart Disease Report", only HALF of [#3 of the Lifespan Report] "Important Context and Purpose of This Report" is online. The 2nd half of #3 should be read to fully grasp the context of these reports. The 2nd half may or may not ever be put online, but even if it is there are still at least 17 different sections of the Lifespan Report. No more than 3 out of 17 sections will ever be put online. A new version of the Lifespan Report is now being edited and is expected to be available July 2000. Indicate your interest now by email, fax, or mail and details including price will be returned when available. "The Fully-Integrated Answer To Disease, Part I", especially Master Protocol section, and the "Heart & Vascular Disease Report" contain specifics on much of the topics covered in #3 above.
Main Technical Reference (see Life Extension Report (LER) and 120 Year Diet for others):
The Retardation of Aging and Disease By Dietary Restriction by Drs. Richard Weindruch and Roy L. Walford (Charles L. Thomas, Springfield ILL, 1988)
Walford, The 120 Year Diet, Pocket Books, 1986; Maximum Lifespan, 1983
Walford, The Anti-Aging Plan, Four Walls Eight Windows, NY, 1994
Atkins, Dr. Atkins Diet Revolution, David Mckay Co., 1972
Atkins, Dr Atkins New diet Revolution, M. Evans & Co., 1992
Rochlitz, Allergies & Candida With the Physicist's Rapid Solution, 3rd. ed., Human Ecology Balancing Sciences, Inc, P.O. Box 21091, Sedona, AZ 86341
Wallach & Lan, Rare Earths: Forbidden Cures, 1994, Double Happiness Publ., Bonita, CA
Home Contact & Orders Income/Money Medicine/Life
Fully-Integrated Honesty: Context & Definition Full Disclaimer
Not affiliated with & no income derived from Neo-Tech Publishing Co.,
Frank Wallace, Mark Hamilton, Ayn Rand, any book writer, or any of their related publishing companies.
© Copyright 2003 Alexander Moss, All Rights Reserved